Skip to content
Dander Down
Pet Hair, Dust & Odor

Winix C710 vs Coway Airmega Mighty AP-1512HH

Two mid-size machines that a pet household will find on every shortlist. Only one of them has numbers produced by somebody other than the company selling it.

By Scooter M.

Published

Last verified

#ad We earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded.

The short answer

The Winix C710 is the better-evidenced buy: AHAM certifies it at 248 smoke CADR across 384 square feet, with a certified 235 kWh a year and no ion generator. The Coway AP-1512HH claims 233 CFM, appears in no certification register, publishes no certified energy figure and draws 77 watts — but it does document a washable pre-filter and a filter interval.

These two land on the same shortlist constantly, and the usual separation is price or looks. There is a sharper one available, and it is the same one that runs through this whole site.

The numbers, side by side

Winix C710 vs Coway Airmega Mighty AP-1512HH
Winix C710Coway AP-1512HH
Smoke CADR248 CFM233 CFM
Dust CADR252 CFM246 CFM
Pollen CADR262 CFM240 CFM
Verified byAHAM VERIFIDENobody — manufacturer only
Certified room size384 sq ft361 sq ft (Coway's own)
Advertised coverageNot published as a 1 ACH figure1,748 sq ft in 60 minutes
Power draw45 W77 W
Annual energy (certified)235 kWhNot published
Electricity per year$43Not published
Measured ozone1 ppbNot published
IonizerNoneBipolar device
Filter class (register)HEPA-TypeNot classified
Washable pre-filterNot documentedYes
Published filter intervalNot published12 months HEPA, 6 months deodorization
Everything in the Winix column marked AHAM or ENERGY STAR can be looked up in a public database in under a minute. Everything in the Coway column comes from Coway.

Electricity costs on this page use 18.34¢ per kWh, the U.S. average residential price for June 2026 from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.3. Your rate is on your bill and is probably not this one; multiply the kWh figure by your own rate and you have your number.

On output they are effectively tied

248 against 233 smoke CADR is a 6% difference, and 384 against 361 square feet is the same 6% expressed as room size. In a real room, in a real household, that is not a distinction you will perceive. Anybody telling you one of these clears a room noticeably faster than the other is inventing a difference.

On the pollen figure the C710 leads more clearly — 262 against 240 — which matters if seasonal allergy is part of why you are buying. The pollen roundup ranks on that column specifically.

On power they are not close

77 watts against 45 is the largest measurable gap between these machines. Coway publishes the figure openly, to its credit. For a purifier that runs continuously — which is what a shedding household needs — that is most of a 70% difference in electricity for the same air.

AHAM certifies the C710 at 235 kWh a year, which is $43 at the U.S. average residential rate. Coway publishes no certified annual figure for the Mighty, and we are not going to derive one from wattage and present it as equivalent — the certified number contains a duty-cycle assumption that a back-of-envelope multiplication does not.

On verification they are not comparable

The C710 is in AHAM’s directory of certified room air cleaners, which means an independent laboratory verified its ratings against ANSI/AHAM AC-1. It is also in the ENERGY STAR database, which publishes its measured ozone emission — 1 ppb — and its certified annual energy use.

The AP-1512HH is in neither. Coway’s figures may be entirely accurate; the company is reputable and its numbers are internally consistent with AHAM’s own room-size formula. But that model also ships a bipolar ionizing stage with no published ozone measurement from anyone, which is the part that would concern us in a bedroom.

Where the Coway genuinely wins

Two things, and both matter specifically in a pet household.

A documented washable pre-filter. Shed hair and coarse dander load a HEPA cartridge fast, and a rinsable mesh in front of it is the difference between a twelve-month filter and a nine-month one. Coway documents one on the Mighty. Winix documents one on the 5500-2 rather than the C710.

Published filter intervals. Coway publishes 12 months for the HEPA filter and 6 for the deodorization filter. Winix publishes no interval for the C710 that we could source, and an unpriced, unscheduled filter is the half of the running cost nobody budgets for — what filters cost over three years.

Quick picks

Both machines, plus the one we would actually buy for a pet household at this size.

#ProductBest forCertified CADRPrice
1
No photo
What we would actually buy

Honeywell HPA6000

257 certified CFM on 34.9 watts, classified HEPA, 0.00 ppb ozone.

Large living rooms, true HEPA257CFM smoke
AHAM VERIFIDE
2
Winix Winix C710
Better evidenced of the two

Winix C710

248 certified CFM, AHAM listed, 235 certified kWh, no ion generator.

Lowest running cost at living-room size248CFM smoke
AHAM VERIFIDE
3
No photo
Better documented consumables

Coway Airmega Mighty AP-1512HH

Washable pre-filter and published intervals — but in no register.

The popular default, unverified233CFM smoke
Manufacturer-claimed

#ad We earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded.

The picks

Better evidenced

Winix C710

Winix · model C710

Winix Winix C710
Check price on Amazon

#ad We earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded.

Nearly the same air movement as the AT41 for a third less electricity a year. If you can find it, it is the cheapest certified 380-plus square-foot unit to run.

AHAM VERIFIDE

248 smoke / 252 dust / 262 pollen CFM · 250 PM2.5

Certified room size
384 sq ft
Energy / year
235 kWh
Our arithmetic
Electricity / year
$43
Air per watt
6.2 CFM/W
Power draw
45 W
Noise
Not published
Measured ozone
1 ppb
Filter class
HEPA-Type
Our arithmetic
AHAM rule, 350 sq ft
Clears it (234 needed)
Ionizer status

No ionizer — filtration only

AHAM classifies this model 'Fan with Filter'.

Why this matters if anyone in the house has asthma

248 certified smoke CADR across 384 certified square feet, no ion generator, and 235 certified kWh a year — $43. AHAM records the filter set with a carbon stage, which is the part that addresses pet odor rather than dander.

The honest con: ENERGY STAR classifies the filter HEPA-Type rather than HEPA, it measures 1 ppb of ozone rather than zero, and Winix publishes neither a washable pre-filter nor a filter interval for it. In a heavy-shedding house that last omission is a real gap.

Better documented consumables

Coway Airmega Mighty AP-1512HH

Coway · model Airmega Mighty AP-1512HH

No photoNo manufacturer photograph in our sources for this model
Check price on Amazon

#ad We earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded.

The most-recommended air purifier in this category, and the one with no third-party CADR to check. Coway's own figures are good; at 77 watts it is also the thirstiest machine here for its output.

Manufacturer-claimed

233 smoke / 246 dust / 240 pollen CFM

Certified room size
361 sq ft
Advertised coverage
1,748 sq ft in 60 minutes
Power draw
77 W
Noise
24-53 dB(A)
Our arithmetic
AHAM rule, 350 sq ft
Short (234 needed)
Ionizer status

Bipolar device — fitted

Coway lists a 'Bipolar Device' as the fourth filtration stage. Because this model is in neither register, there is no independent ozone measurement for it — and Coway does not publish one.

Why this matters if anyone in the house has asthma

A capable machine on the manufacturer’s own numbers — 233 CFM across 361 square feet — with the two things the Winix lacks: a documented washable pre-filter and published filter intervals for both stages.

The honest con: it is in no certification register, so every figure above is Coway’s. It draws 77 watts, the highest for its output of anything we cover. And it carries a bipolar ionizing stage with no published ozone measurement from any source, which in a bedroom is the argument against it.

What we would actually buy

Honeywell HPA6000

Honeywell · model HPA6000B

No photoNo manufacturer photograph in our sources for this model
Check price on Amazon

#ad We earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you. How this site is funded.

More certified air movement than the HPA4300 for four more watts, and the same zero on ozone. The sensible step up if your room is nearer 400 square feet.

AHAM VERIFIDE

257 smoke / 262 dust / 285 pollen CFM · 259 PM2.5

Certified room size
398 sq ft
Energy / year
207 kWh
Our arithmetic
Electricity / year
$38
Air per watt
7.3 CFM/W
Power draw
34.9 W
Noise
Not published
Measured ozone
0 ppb
Filter class
HEPA
Our arithmetic
AHAM rule, 350 sq ft
Clears it (234 needed)
Ionizer status

No ionizer — filtration only

Why this matters if anyone in the house has asthma

Buyer-first: at this room size neither of the machines above is the best answer. The HPA6000 posts 257 certified smoke CADR — more than either — across 398 certified square feet, on 34.9 watts. That is $38 a year against the C710’s $43, with 0.00 ppb measured ozone, no ion stage, and a filter the register classifies HEPA rather than HEPA-Type.

The honest con: no washable pre-filter and no published noise figure, so in a heavy-shedding household you will be changing a full cartridge more often than a Coway owner changes a rinsable mesh.

Common questions

Is the Winix C710 better than the Coway Mighty?

On evidence, yes. The C710 is listed in AHAM’s directory at 248 certified smoke CADR with a certified 235 kWh a year and no ion generator. The AP-1512HH is in neither register, so its 233 CFM is Coway’s own figure, it publishes no certified annual energy use, and it draws 77 watts. The Coway’s advantages are a documented washable pre-filter and a published filter interval, both of which matter in a shedding household.

Does the Coway AP-1512HH have an ionizer?

Coway lists a “Bipolar Device” as the fourth stage of its filtration, which is an ionizing component. Because the model is in neither certification register there is no independent ozone measurement published for it, and Coway does not publish one either. The C710 has no ion generator — AHAM classifies it “Fan with Filter” — and ENERGY STAR measures 1 ppb.

Which is better for pet hair specifically?

The Coway, narrowly, on one documented feature: a washable pre-filter, which catches shed hair before it loads the HEPA cartridge. Winix documents a washable pre-filter on the 5500-2 rather than the C710. Which units actually document one is a short list, and it is worth reading before you assume yours has one.

Is the Coway Mighty still sold?

Yes. Coway has released a successor and is running it alongside the original rather than retiring it, so the AP-1512HH remains widely available at the major retailers. Its certification status has not changed: it is still in neither AHAM’s directory nor the ENERGY STAR database.

Sources

Figures were read on the dates shown against each source. If one has changed, or if we have got something wrong, tell us and we will correct the page.